Which AI Agents Are Available – and Which Fit Your Business?
- Samir Kilani
- Apr 19
- 2 min read
The battle has truly begun. New developments in AI are moving so quickly that this article might already be partly outdated next week. But that’s exactly why it’s important to keep an overview now.

AI agents are popping up everywhere. Some promise full automation of your work. Others mainly ask follow-up questions. Some can be trained or connected to your systems. Others only work within their own environment.
But what does this mean for you?
What Is an AI Agent – and What Isn’t?
An AI agent is not a chatbot. It’s also not a workflow.
An AI agent is a digital colleague that can independently perform tasks based on input, context, logic, and sometimes memory.
This means:
retrieving information
creating or sending something
controlling multiple tools
responding to triggers
in some cases: participating in team environments like Slack or Jira
An agent doesn’t think for you – but it does carry out work you would otherwise do manually.
Overview: Which AI Agents Are Available Now?
Here’s an overview of the most well-known and useful AI agents at the moment. For each platform, you’ll see what it does, what it can’t do (yet), and where it adds value.
Platform | Best Use | Strengths | Limitations |
n8n AI Agents | intake, follow-up, data flows | open-source, powerful, API integrations | requires some technical knowledge |
Zapier Agents | simple workflows, quick tests | fast to deploy, clear interface | still limited, no bulk actions |
OpenAI GPT Agents | intake, customer contact, reporting | great output, usable via Make/n8n | must be triggered externally, no memory |
DeepAgent | works in Slack, Jira | integrates into teams, takes over tasks | limited real-world experience |
Manus | web search, API tasks | fully autonomous, fast | stability and privacy concerns |
Sintra | digital assistants/coaches | ready-made for content/sales/CRM | mainly conversational, low actual autonomy |
LangChain / CrewAI | custom-built agents | team logic, own memory and tools | advanced, requires development capacity |
When Should You Use Which Agent?
Think about the role you want an agent to play in your business:
For intake, follow-up, and proposal flows → GPT + Make or n8n
For automated data processing → n8n agents or DeepAgent
For content generation based on prompts or input → GPT agent, Manus or LangChain
For guidance, reminders, or virtual coaching → Sintra (if you want less automation)
For custom and scalable AI use → LangChain or CrewAI, with FlowBuildr or your own dev team
What You Should Know Before You Start
Not every agent is autonomous. Some need to be triggered via Make, n8n, or Zapier.
Agents are only reliable if you test them and limit their freedom.
Privacy and stability vary greatly between providers.
Not everything should be automated – focus on what you repeat often or tend to forget.
How FlowBuildr Helps You Build (and Test)
We already build agents for:
intake + CRM creation
review requests + follow-up
content flows that generate blogs, videos, and posts
sales agents that gather data and prepare proposals
We test all tools ourselves. If it works, we use it. If not, we skip it.
Want to find out if AI agents can support your business too?
Show us your process, and we’ll explore how an agent could fit in.
Comments